http://www.natureserve.org/Vista (No Longer Available)
Biodiversity Conservation
Ecological Restoration
Freshwater Resource Management
Land Use Planning
Transportation Planning
Alternative Evaluation
Impact Assessment
Location Allocation
Site Search Or Selection
Status Assessment
Suitability Assessment
All (User Specified Domain Knowledge Modeling Area)
Conservation Of Biodiversity
Land Use Allocation
Management Process Modeling
Socioeconomic System Modeling
Condition Assessment
Constraints Specification
Domain Knowledge Process Model Development
Evaluation Criteria Specification
Rank Alternatives
Risk Analysis
Scenario Simulation And Comparison
Specify Criterion Weight
Visualization
Criterion Weighting Methods
Multi-Attribute Combination Methods
What-If Analysis
Data Management
GIS Analysis Integration
GIS Display Integration
Report Generation
Scenario Management And Comparison
Standard Data Import/Export Format Support
Visualization
Biophysical Process
Economic Process
Management Process
Social Process
ESRI Geodatabase
ESRI Shapefile
Raster - ESRI GRID
Map
Map Image
Table
All (User Defined Analysis Extent)
All (User Defined Unit Of Observation)
True ^^ Http://Www.W3.Org/2001/Xmlschema#Boolean
True ^^ Http://Www.W3.Org/2001/Xmlschema#Boolean
True ^^ Http://Www.W3.Org/2001/Xmlschema#Boolean
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Arcgis
Microsoft Access
NatureServe Vista 2.5 now supports the ArcMap 9.2 and 9.3 platform. A key addition to 2.5 is integration with NOAA’s N-SPECT software that provides advanced water quality modeling which will allow Vista to support improved aquatic feature assessment and conservation planning. You may also import results from other hydrological and terrestrial modeling tools and we have experience interoperating NatureServe Vista with land use planning and ecosystem services software.
Selecting conservation elements (ecological systems, plant communities, plant or animal species and compatible but non-biological elements such as viewsheds, soils, historic sites, etc.).
- Weighting elements relative to each other for conservation priority. The user can develop any number of weighting systems such as ESA status or economic value.
- Aggregating elements (optionally as any selection of subgroups) to form an index of conservation value based on richness (number of elements co-occurring in a grid cell), and value (a multiplication of weight x quality x confidence scores). The aggregation is a Conservation Value Summary with eight combinations to emphasize particular characteristics of interest.
- Assigning compatibility ratings between elements and a project classification of land uses, management practices, and other threats such as invasive species or wildfire.
- Setting quantitative conservation goals for elements in terms of percent or number of occurrences or area (acres or hectares). These can include minimum size requirements for viability. Any number of goal sets can be created but most commonly would include a \ minimum\ set for retaining element representation, and a \ preferred\ set for retaining or restoring full ecosystem functioning.
- Scenario import. This function allows you to import any number of layers representing different land use and management policies, plans, current uses, modeled futures, and other threats such as invasive species. These layers are combined into a map of \ land use intent\ and policy type which represents the policy mechanism used to carry out the intended land use (regulation, incentive, easement, legislative designation, etc.). The many land use and management classifications imported into the system can be translated to a single project-wide classification to match up to element compatibilities. These translations are saved to facilitate easy updating and ongoing maintenance of a \ baseline\ scenario of current policies and conditions. New alternative scenarios can easily be created from the baseline to reflect plan or policy change proposals, development proposals, emerging modeled threats, etc.
- Scenario evaluation. This function allows the user to select the elements to be evaluated, the goal set to use for the evaluation, and the list of policy mechanisms in a scenario that the user considers reliable. Any scenario can be evaluated with different assumptions about those inputs. The system then combines the land use and policy type maps of the scenario to be evaluated with the selected elements. The comparison uses the specific goals and minimum required areas of the elements and compares their compatibilities with the scenario's land use intent map. The result is a series of maps and tables that provide the statistics for each element of area and number of occurrences existing, the stated goal, the area and occurrences in compatible land use/management and the area and occurrences in compatible land use/management and supported by reliable policy mechanisms. Maps include: a) an overall compatibility conflict map which shows in shades of red the areas where elements occur in conflict with intended land use/management (with darker shades indicating conflict richness); b) same as \ a\ but for policy mechanism conflicts where shading indicates compatible land use but supported by unreliable policies; c) element maps showing their distribution as protected/unprotected.
- Scenario generation (planned version 1.3 function) will allow the user to use optimization algorithms (e.g., MARXAN, Sites) to identify a set of planning units (e.g., parcels) that can satisfy conservation goals for all elements.
- Site evaluation and mitigation planning (planned version 1.3 function) will allow the user to select a site (parcel, management unit, watershed, etc.) view its biodiversity content and intended land use/management regime and the effect on goals for each element. The user can then conduct \ what if\ queries by substituting different land use/management regimes and implementation or policy mechanisms. The result is an instant report of effect on goal achievement for each element. If the outcome is desirable, the user can save each site modification to a new scenario, thus creating a conservation or mitigation plan on the fly specifying the desirable land use/management for each site and the mechanism to be used for implementation.
General Understanding Of Issues
Some Computer/GIS Programming Skills
True ^^ Http://Www.W3.Org/2001/Xmlschema#Boolean
False ^^ Http://Www.W3.Org/2001/Xmlschema#Boolean
Free
Regularly Distributed
Natureserve
National Commission On Science For Sustainable Forestry
Software Tools And Models - All
Spatial Decision Support Systems
2011-02-11T14:13:53.325-08:00 ^^ http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime
Alternative Ranking, Decision Making
Condition Analysis And Assessment
Decision Alternatives Generation, Scenario Simulation
Domain Knowledge Modeling
Visualization
Spatial Decision Support Systems
Evaluative Models
Simulation Models